<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Goud.com Forum</title>
		<link>http://forum.goud.com/</link>
		<description>Goudforum</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:16:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Inflation Mega-Trend Long-term Growth Spiral Continues to Drive Stock Market Trend</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13727-inflation-mega-trend-long-term-growth-spiral-continues-drive-stock-market-trend.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The stock market closed up 298 points on the week at 10,448 (10,150). The bears that predominantly  follow a non existant deflationary scenario,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The stock market closed up 298 points on the week at 10,448 (10,150). The bears that predominantly  follow a non existant deflationary scenario, consistently and persistently fail to comprehend what drives the worlds economies and stock markets which is the inflation mega-trend. Governments and their respective central banks are engaged in a perpetual cycle of inflationary money printing policies with the sole aim of concentrating power and wealth into their own hands by stealing the wealth of savers and purchasing power of workers.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22462.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13727-inflation-mega-trend-long-term-growth-spiral-continues-drive-stock-market-trend.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>High Roads to China</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13726-high-roads-china.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AW-lkEG5oEXilXuZwK35J246Lx4/0/di  (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AW-lkEG5oEXilXuZwK35J246Lx4/0/da)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AW-lkEG5oEXilXuZwK35J246Lx4/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AW-lkEG5oEXilXuZwK35J246Lx4/0/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AW-lkEG5oEXilXuZwK35J246Lx4/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/AW-lkEG5oEXilXuZwK35J246Lx4/1/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
By Dian L. Chu, <a href="http://dianchu.blogspot.com/2010/09/high-roads-to-china.html" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">Economic Forecasts Opinions</font></a> <br />
<br />
Well, it is official now - in addition to the Great Wall, the Great Traffic Jam started on Aug. 14--60 miles and ten-day long on an "expressway" into Beijing from Inner Mongolia (see map)--has earned the capital of China the top spot among the cities with the world's worst traffic&hellip;, at least according to <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/08/24/the_world_s_worst_traffic?page=0,0" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">Foreign Policy</font></a>. <br />
<br />
Although that logjam seemed to have cleared up, Reuters reported on Sep. 3 yet another similar 75-mile (120 km) crawl in Inner Mongolia on the same highway heading toward Beijing and the neighboring province of Hebei.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TILgP2KRhfI/AAAAAAAABm0/5TG-o-BCHGc/s1600/China+Jam.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TILgP2KRhfI/AAAAAAAABm0/5TG-o-BCHGc/s320/China+Jam.png" border="0" alt="" /></a><i>Graphic Source: <a href="http://www.newgeography.com/content/001745-what%E2%80%99s-behind-china%E2%80%99s-big-traffic-jam" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">newgeography.com</font></a></i><b>Infrastructure Under-capacity</b><br />
<br />
Until recent years, China was able to maintain growth despite its inadequate infrastructure; however, this is not the case anymore. While the world seems quite fixated on the length--miles and number of days--of these mega jams near Beijing, there's also a serious message--the under-capacity of China&rsquo;s infrastructure. <br />
<br />
<b>Coal Overloads While Rail Lags</b><br />
<br />
Both super-sized gridlocks reportedly were caused primarily by heavy trucks transporting illegal coal, compounded by road maintenance works. China is the world's top producer and consumer of coal. However, with limited rail lines, China's roads often suffer from the spillover of illegally overloaded trucks, especially along key coal regions. And Inner Mongolia is an important coal producing region in north China. <br />
<br />
<b>&ldquo;Shorter Than a Cigarette&rdquo;</b><br />
<br />
The per capita railway mileage in China is estimated to be only 6 cm--<a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-01/03/content_10597778.htm" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">shorter than a cigarette</font></a>&mdash;and remains below those of developed economies. In addition to commercial lines, the inadequate rail network also has been causing serious passenger travel headache, particularly during the annual spring festival migration. Cognizant of the crucial link between infrastructure and economic growth, China is keen to catch up. <br />
<br />
Infrastructure investment was the cornerstone of China's economic growth last year. In 2009, China <a href="http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90778/90860/6965110.html" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">pumped $102.7 billion</font></a> of investment into railways, an increase of 69.1% year over year, with high-speed passenger rail lines accounting for almost 60%, according to the report released this April by China's Ministry of Railway (MOR). <br />
<br />
The country already has the world's largest high-speed rail network with 6,920 km of tracks, and is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703862704575098921097436494.html" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">planning</font></a> to lay down 42,000 km of new rail track by 2020, much of it completed by 2012, adding new high-speed rail lines between major cities. <br />
<br />
However, as China&rsquo;s Minister of Railways Liu Zhijun noted last year, &ldquo;...even in the future, China's railway mileage of 1.2 million km road network is still relatively low intensity.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
<b>Commuter Pain <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%231" target="_blank">#1</a> &ndash; Beijing</b> <br />
<br />
Even without the latest headline road congestions outside the city, Beijing already has taken the top spot in "Commuter Pain&rdquo; among major world cities based on <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/32017.wss" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">IBM's latest survey</font></a>.  And that&rsquo;s with 44% of the respondents in Beijing taking bus to and from work, based on the same IBM survey. <br />
<br />
The ranking is of no surprise.  According to <a href="http://newgeography.com/" target="_blank"><font color="#2800df">Newgeography.com</font></a>, by 2008, Beijing has reached a <i><b>car ownership</b></i> rate almost equal to that of <i><b>New York City</b></i> dense boroughs, but with <i><b>1.5 times as many drivers per household</b></i>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TIMJgl3Bj7I/AAAAAAAABnc/TUcRtJFypMg/s1600/IBM+Pain+Index.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TIMJgl3Bj7I/AAAAAAAABnc/TUcRtJFypMg/s320/IBM+Pain+Index.png" border="0" alt="" /></a></div> <br />
<br />
<b>The Great Auto Boom of China</b><br />
<br />
The city of Beijing is not along in this predicament as other cities in China are also facing growing congestion headaches. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aE.x_r_l9NZE" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">Bloomberg</font></a> reported Chinese vehicle ownership climbed 51-fold, while per capital disposable income for Chinese households increased 46-fold in nominal terms from 1977 to 2008. <br />
<br />
Somewhere along the line, China dethroned the U.S. as the world&rsquo;s largest auto market when its automobile sales zipped past the U.S. for the first time in 2009, when its total car sales hit 13.6 million vehicles, up 46% from 2008. <br />
<br />
China is racing to build new roads and has embarked in recent years on a huge expansion of its national road system. Nevertheless, the road upgrade and expansion has failed and to keep pace with, and will continue to lag behind the rising car buying and driving population (Chart 1). <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TILhRMhuCuI/AAAAAAAABnE/y2z_7tkcyWk/s1600/China+Road.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TILhRMhuCuI/AAAAAAAABnE/y2z_7tkcyWk/s320/China+Road.png" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><div align="left">And the latest data offers few contradictions to this great auto boom.  China's car sales in August rose 55.7% on the year, as renewed subsidies for energy-efficient vehicles and a stronger yuan currency spurred demand.  Jeffrey Shen, CEO of Ford Motor China this week <a href="http://www.newgeography.com/content/001745-what%E2%80%99s-behind-china%E2%80%99s-big-traffic-jam" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">told Reuters</font></a> that he is projecting auto sales in China this year to <i><b>grow by 15-25%</b></i>, after a breakneck 45% rise in 2009. </div><br />
<b>Law of (transportation) Supply &amp; Demand</b><br />
<br />
China is going through a "growth normalization" phase after the Great Stimulus (4 trillion yuan) of 2009, and there are worries of a slowdown, even crash, partly as a result of the high base last year. However, Chin&rsquo;s &ldquo;normalized&rdquo; growth forecast is still in the <i><b>8-10%</b></i> range for 2010, and growth is becoming more broad-based as domestic consumption growth has strengthened since 2008. <br />
<br />
As opposed to the chorus of Chinese overbuilding bubble focusing on some <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2010/05/12/revisiting-chinas-empty-city-of-ordos/" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">overhyped planning misses</font></a> not representative of the overall picture, China essentially has to keep expanding and upgrading its transport infrastructure (road, rail, ports, etc.) just based on the basic law of supply and demand, regardless of its monetary policy.    <br />
<br />
<b>Stay Logistically Competitive </b><br />
<br />
According to World Bank statistics, goods lost due to poor or obsolete transportation infrastructure amounted to 1% of China's GDP based on the most current survey (mid 1990's). Logistic costs account for 20% of a products price in China; compared to 10% in the U.S. (The numbers probably would be higher by now in light of China's rapid growth rate since the mid 1990s.) <br />
<br />
In order to stay competitive while meeting future social economic development needs, China will likely keep a strong commitment to accelerate its infrastructure development for years to come (think the next decade, minimum) just to play the catch-up game. <br />
<br />
<b>About &ldquo;Face&rdquo;</b><br />
<br />
Furthermore, the recent world headline grabbing super traffic jams have put the number two economy in the world in a somewhat negative spotlight. I'd suspect Chinese government would most likely accelerate and re-appropriate funding and projects just to rid of this not-so-favorable image and press. <br />
<br />
<b>Now Playing - Great Infrastructure Expansion </b><br />
<br />
Recent data affirmed that total fixed asset investment for the first seven months was up 24.9% year-over-year, while railway construction also registered a 17% year-on-year growth, albeit at a slower rate than last year. (Char 2)<br />
<br />
Although they are not covered in this discussion, infrastructure expansion will likely also continue in other developing regions like <i><b>India </b></i>and <b><i>Brazil,</i></b> in addition to China. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TILy9OCEXkI/AAAAAAAABnU/Ew8fSD9exgQ/s1600/China+Fixed+Aseet+Investment.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1o2wiBm5r_M/TILy9OCEXkI/AAAAAAAABnU/Ew8fSD9exgQ/s320/China+Fixed+Aseet+Investment.png" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
<b>Investing Ideas</b><br />
<br />
This trend should provide good long-term growth prospect up and down the entire infrastructure supply chain from raw material, equipment to construction companies like China Railway Group, China Railway Construction Corp., Caterpillar (CAT), General Electric (GE), CNH Global N.V. (CNH), KOMATSU LTD, and VOLVO Group. <br />
<br />
There are also some infrastructure-focused ETFs that could give individual investors some broad coverage such as iShares S&amp;P Global Infrastructure Index Fund (IGF), SPDR FTSE/Macquarie Global Infrastructure 100 (GII), PowerShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure Portfolio (PXR). <br />
<br />
INDXX China Infrastructure Index Fund (CHXX), and Global X China Materials ETF (CHIM) are examples of funds specifically focusing on China. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://dianchu.blogspot.com/2010/09/high-roads-to-china.html" target="_blank"><font color="#5664c6">Dian L. Chu</font></a>, Sept. 4, 2010<br />
<br />
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/Mizm8wkMQEw" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/Mizm8wkMQEw/high-roads-china" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>ZeroHedge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13726-high-roads-china.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>In September Europe Must Issue Double The August Government Debt</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13725-september-europe-must-issue-double-august-government-debt.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tp35MUB8lkpRjNKtGtk-uAvni48/0/di  (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tp35MUB8lkpRjNKtGtk-uAvni48/0/da)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tp35MUB8lkpRjNKtGtk-uAvni48/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tp35MUB8lkpRjNKtGtk-uAvni48/0/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tp35MUB8lkpRjNKtGtk-uAvni48/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tp35MUB8lkpRjNKtGtk-uAvni48/1/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Summer vacation is over and things in Europe may soon start rocking and rolling all over again. Not only is France about to experience its first 24 hour general strike this Tuesday in a long time, which will likely remind everyone else in Europe (hint Greece and Ireland) that austerity is the new normal across the Atlantic and the 14th annual monthly salary is not going to come back just because nobody is talking about it, but as the FT reports Europe needs to issue double the amount of debt in September compared to August. From the FT: "Eurozone governments will try to raise &euro;80bn ($103bn) in  September compared with new bond issuance of &euro;43bn in August. Spain is  expected to attempt to borrow &euro;7bn in September compared with &euro;3.5bn in  August, according to ING Financial Markets." The dramatic ramp up in issuance is forcing the FT to speculate that "some of the weaker economies could fail to  raise the amount of money they need as eurozone governments attempt to  issue double the amount of debt this month compared with August." For all those who have been waiting for the perfect storm in Europe to finally develop the time of waiting may be over. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/abe5bf60-b8dc-11df-99be-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">More from the FT</a>:<br />
<blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Padhraic Garvey, head of rates strategy for developed markets at ING Financial Markets, said: &ldquo;We are heading into a critical period as the chances rise that a government may fail to raise the money it needs.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Spain, Portugal and Ireland are the obvious ones to worry about. Are investors willing to stay long, or buy the debt of these countries? I&rsquo;m still not seeing investors willing to buy into the periphery.&rdquo;<br />
<b><br />
Some strategists say the return of most investors from holidays this week could increase volatility in these markets because many have put decisions on their portfolios on hold during the summer.</b><br />
<br />
With most investors back at their desks, some could start selling peripheral debt in the coming weeks, particularly as the outlook for the global economy has deteriorated. In spite of some better than expected data out of the US last week, worries about a double-dip recession have increased.<br />
<br />
But other strategists insist governments will have little difficulty in funding themselves, even if they have to pay higher premiums or yields to attract investors. They say countries such as Portugal and Ireland have already raised most of the money they need this year.<br />
<br />
<b>Government bond yields of the peripheral countries, however, may come under further selling pressure. </b><br />
<br />
</blockquote>Expect the stock market to begin acting even more deranged over the next three weeks, now that the Fed has to perform double duty to make sure that all the upcoming auctions don't clog the system to a halt, and the realization that Europe has been bankrupt all along in 2010 isn't comprehended by too many of the "naifs." <br />
<br />
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/hvnoBVCUngo" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/hvnoBVCUngo/september-europe-must-issue-double-government-debt-month-ago" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>ZeroHedge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13725-september-europe-must-issue-double-august-government-debt.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A Walk in the Woods – We Hate Goldman</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13724-walk-woods-we-hate-goldman.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:17:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jNsqLFQ9Vl1Gv2J2UmBUhm8Vwo/0/di  (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jNsqLFQ9Vl1Gv2J2UmBUhm8Vwo/0/da)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jNsqLFQ9Vl1Gv2J2UmBUhm8Vwo/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jNsqLFQ9Vl1Gv2J2UmBUhm8Vwo/0/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jNsqLFQ9Vl1Gv2J2UmBUhm8Vwo/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3jNsqLFQ9Vl1Gv2J2UmBUhm8Vwo/1/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Not too far from me is a park area called Teatown. It is about 850 acres and has 15 miles of trails through forests and lakes. Most of the land and a good chunk of the budget is donated by local supporters. During the summer there are busloads of kids from the city that come to enjoy a day in the woods. I go there once in a while to burn off some stress and enjoy being alone in nature. I did that yesterday afternoon. I chose a trail I have not been on in some years.  Aptly called:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIO1199lb1I/AAAAAAAABck/F2qgyCW8j1g/s1600/back40trail%282%29.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIO1199lb1I/AAAAAAAABck/F2qgyCW8j1g/s400/back40trail%282%29.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
Parts of the trail are well traveled.<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-NHBvbWI/AAAAAAAABc0/hr36aAfEh6Y/s1600/widepath" target="_blank"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-NHBvbWI/AAAAAAAABc0/hr36aAfEh6Y/s400/widepath" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
Other parts not.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-gtgg1pI/AAAAAAAABc8/9jM8KQJAJ3k/s1600/narrowpath.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-gtgg1pI/AAAAAAAABc8/9jM8KQJAJ3k/s400/narrowpath.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
<br />
Along the way you see the improvements that some individuals have made. For example, this walkway over a wetland.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-wQPrlAI/AAAAAAAABdE/3jrAs9-Xqkw/s1600/walkway.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-wQPrlAI/AAAAAAAABdE/3jrAs9-Xqkw/s400/walkway.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
A Mr. Oldenberg made this possible back in 1990.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-_Whn5fI/AAAAAAAABdM/w0VvTEUMeac/s1600/IMG_0821.JPG" target="_blank"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP-_Whn5fI/AAAAAAAABdM/w0VvTEUMeac/s400/IMG_0821.JPG" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
A number of others who have appreciated this spot have made similar contributions.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP_ZWhCNzI/AAAAAAAABdc/Uq8t7mlkeK4/s1600/DSC01497.JPG" target="_blank"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP_ZWhCNzI/AAAAAAAABdc/Uq8t7mlkeK4/s400/DSC01497.JPG" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP_T6WFybI/AAAAAAAABdU/HUsg-P2xg98/s1600/DSC01496.JPG" target="_blank"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP_T6WFybI/AAAAAAAABdU/HUsg-P2xg98/s400/DSC01496.JPG" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
On my walk I came to this &ldquo;busy&rdquo; intersection.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP_x12JDWI/AAAAAAAABdk/z4H7bQwOhOY/s1600/DSC01483.JPG" target="_blank"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIP_x12JDWI/AAAAAAAABdk/z4H7bQwOhOY/s400/DSC01483.JPG" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
You can imagine (if you know me) my anger, shock and disappointment to see this at the trail juncture:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIQAAVl5-zI/AAAAAAAABds/l9-lVrJNTAo/s1600/DSC01479.JPG" target="_blank"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIQAAVl5-zI/AAAAAAAABds/l9-lVrJNTAo/s400/DSC01479.JPG" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><br />
<br />
Apparently three years ago the nice folks at Goldie wrote a tax deductable check and had some help bring in some wood chips for this trail. Now they get a plaque with their name on it that will last forever.  Whatever improvements GS made back then have been washed away from three hard winters. But Goldie still has their advertisement right in the middle of the woods.<br />
<br />
I was looking at this and taking a picture when a teenage couple came up the path. I guessed that they were not this deep in the woods for &ldquo;sylvan&rdquo; pleasures.  I pointed to the sign and asked:<br />
<br />
<b>BK:</b> <i><font face="Georgia">Do you know who Goldman Sachs is?</font></i><br />
<br />
<b>BOY:</b> <i><font face="Georgia">They&rsquo;re the ones who stole the money in the stock market.</font></i><br />
<br />
<b>GIRL:</b><i> My father says it&rsquo;s the Wall Street that caused the depression.</i><br />
<br />
<b>BK:</b> <i>That sounds about right.</i><br />
<br />
<b>BOY:</b> <i><font face="Georgia">Should we rip it out?</font></i><br />
<br />
<b>BK:</b> <i><font face="Georgia">No. Let&rsquo;s leave it. Everyone who walks by this spot will be reminded of how much we don&rsquo;t like these guys. </font></i><br />
<br />
<b>BOY:</b> <i><font face="Georgia">Okay. Which way you going?</font></i><br />
<br />
I pointed left. They went right.<br />
<br />
<br />
I have said many times that you can&rsquo;t do <b>GOOD</b> and at the same time do <b>WELL</b> on Wall Street. GS and its partners are doing very WELL. They attempt to do some GOOD things in an effort to create a softer image and create a tax deduction. It will not work. Teenagers and old cynics like me see through it. <br />
<br />
GS should take down the sign in the woods. It is having the exact opposite reaction to what they intended. It reminds us that we don&rsquo;t like them. We know they are predators. And we know that predators, like wolves, have a place in this world. But we don&rsquo;t want these wolves in our backyard. <br />
<br />
If the deep thinkers at GS read this I hope they get the message. You&rsquo;re best advised to keep a low profile. Don&rsquo;t rile us more. Keep you&rsquo;re &ldquo;<b>We&rsquo;re good guys</b>&rdquo; signs out of our sight. We know that is just crap. <br />
<br />
Excuse the personal rant.<br />
bk<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div align="center"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIPBiNIgMxI/AAAAAAAABcs/gfXYtLZC754/s1600/wolves_005.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5JJarCb6DPo/TIPBiNIgMxI/AAAAAAAABcs/gfXYtLZC754/s400/wolves_005.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/FYj5hEgwfjs" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/FYj5hEgwfjs/walk-woods-%E2%80%93-we-hate-goldman" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>ZeroHedge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13724-walk-woods-we-hate-goldman.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What If “It” Doesn’t End With a Bang But With a Whimper?  Mind Games - Chapter Two of</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13723-what-if-doesn-t-end-bang-but-whimper-mind-games-chapter-two.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vT3i57J9CJg7Sml9NuSLYm3qeh0/0/di  (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vT3i57J9CJg7Sml9NuSLYm3qeh0/0/da)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vT3i57J9CJg7Sml9NuSLYm3qeh0/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vT3i57J9CJg7Sml9NuSLYm3qeh0/0/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vT3i57J9CJg7Sml9NuSLYm3qeh0/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vT3i57J9CJg7Sml9NuSLYm3qeh0/1/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<div align="center"><div align="center">What If &ldquo;It&rdquo; Doesn&rsquo;t End With a Bang But With a Whimper?</div><br />
<div align="center">Mind Games - Chapter Two of Two</div><br />
</div><br />
&ldquo;It ain&rsquo;t what you don&rsquo;t know that gets you into trouble. It&rsquo;s what you know for sure that just ain&rsquo;t so.&rdquo; &ndash; Mark Twain<br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
<i>May I suggest the reader begin with Chapter One (link below) before progressing further in order to fully understand my meaning when I use various terms or phrases in this essay. </i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.zerohedge.com/article/what-if-%E2%80%9Cit%E2%80%9D-doesn%E2%80%99t-end-bang-whimper-mind-games-chapter-one-two" target="_blank"><u><font color="#800080">http://www.zerohedge.com/article/what-if-%E2%80%9Cit%E2%80%9D-doesn%E2%80%99t-end-bang-whimper-mind-games-chapter-one-two</font></u></a><br />
<br />
I started Chapter One with a simple declaration. The more certain I am that I&rsquo;m right, the greater the probability I&rsquo;m wrong. I shall continue that discussion in this final chapter, but with particular emphasis placed on questioning the majority held opinion that The Crash, defined as a relatively quick decline of the economic and social systems, is coming. <br />
<br />
Rather than try and define the hundreds of variations of how &ldquo;It&rdquo; might play out, let&rsquo;s just say that for the purpose of this essay, the opposite of The Crash is a much longer and slower decline peppered with a few rapid plunges along the way.<br />
<br />
Could the Zero Hedge consensus view be wrong? Is everyone keying off the collective bias and missing signs that the crash might play out as a slow exhalation of air and bubbles as The Empire sinks slowly beneath the waves? It&rsquo;s quite possible this is what&rsquo;s going on despite occasional rapid drops. Rather than look at the mechanics, it&rsquo;s far more intstructive to examine our own psychology. After all, it&rsquo;s the human psyche that&rsquo;s the ultimate source of the instability that drives the decline and fall.<br />
<br />
<b>Layers of Self Deception</b><br />
<br />
It makes it so much easier to deal with life&rsquo;s ugly inconsistencies when we can sweep them under the intellectual rug. And it all happens in seconds with barely a blip in our blood pressure. The really tough dissonances might take a little longer, but never underestimate our capacity for self deception. And this cognitive tango is always running in the back ground with very little conscious awareness. Unless, of course, we train ourselves to see what&rsquo;s going on. But who&rsquo;d want to do that?<br />
<br />
Since recognizing these cognitive gymnastics and then compensating for them requires self examination and personal courage, is it any wonder the average Joe&rsquo;s worldview is distorted? It may come as a shock to learn that for <b>all of us</b>, our worldview isn&rsquo;t affected so much by a lack of information as our lack of desire to (re)examine, update and accept it. The only information vacuum we live in is the one we create between our ears. <br />
<br />
Maybe it&rsquo;s time to question our fundamental beliefs in the face of a relentless Ponzi. We claim private and governmental interests are pulling a confidence game on the public and that we&rsquo;re not fooled by it anymore because we clearly see the deception. But is this really the case? How deep down the rabbit hole have we gone and how many holes are there anyway? <br />
<br />
For many of us we&rsquo;ve gone just far enough to confirm our basic suspicions, but not so far as to face some really ugly realities. Or to be fair let&rsquo;s call them ugly probabilities. We&rsquo;re willing to think outside the conventional wisdom box, but not <b>too</b> far out. I mean, let&rsquo;s be reasonable here, some things are just crazy right? But when we offer that excuse, are we respecting society&rsquo;s reasonable boundaries or our own emotional limits? In most cases I&rsquo;d say it&rsquo;s the latter.<br />
<br />
We construct and maintain our belief system and worldview not in order to understand reality, but to protect us from the emotional trauma inflicted upon us by reality. We&rsquo;re taught a fairy tale from birth of how the world and our country functions, including a propagandized and mythical history. For many of us, we spend our lives defending that fairy tale as best we can with the only tools at our disposal, primarily denial and the quasi fantasy world we&rsquo;ve constructed that we call our belief system. <br />
<br />
Don&rsquo;t get hung up on the word &ldquo;fantasy&rdquo; because we&rsquo;re not talking about absolutes with regard to denial, but rather shape shifting and blurred lines. Since we all see the world differently, it can be argued that while there are many agreed upon &ldquo;facts&rdquo; we all share within the consensus reality, there&rsquo;s plenty of wiggle room for deviation and denial, particularly if we&rsquo;re the judge, jury and executioner of our own specially constructed inner world. <br />
<br />
After all what is denial, but simply an altered perceived reality, our version of what&rsquo;s real and what&rsquo;s not as seen through our own infinitely variable cognitive filters? We all own a pair of rose colored glasses that are completely customizable and personalized. One might say that denial is self inflicted propaganda for it serves the same purpose as corporate and governmental propaganda, that of spinning the (ugly) truth into something more palatable. <br />
<br />
As we grow, and as needed to survive and thrive, we modify and alter our beliefs to accommodate &ldquo;the real world&rdquo;. But we do this begrudgingly and only when we&rsquo;re left with little or no choice. Most importantly, rarely do we apply logic and consistency to the process nor is there an annual review or a ritual spring cleaning. <br />
<br />
Like a partially formed gaseous monster straight out of Star Trek, denial has few clear boundaries or sharp edges. It expands and contracts to fill the emotional needs of its user and it rarely can be positively identified or quantified as this or that fact based truth. However, the key ingredient to denial is convincing ourselves that truth is <u>all</u> we deal with. This nebulous quality is what gives denial its enormous power to leap tall dissonances in a single bound. We may power it, but for the most part denial controls us.<br />
<br />
In a positive defense of denial, it <u>can</u> be used as part of a suite of cognitive tools to help absorb new or different perceptions into our belief system. Think of using denial as a holding pattern while we attempt to land new information for assimilation. The problem begins when we become trapped in the holding pattern and are unwilling to accept the differences or reject incorrect beliefs. We then become mired in the muck of our rigid belief system and denial is no longer used as a bridge but as a dam.<br />
<br />
<b>Bending in the Wind</b><br />
<br />
When we read or leave comments on ZH that contain the words &ldquo;I&rsquo;ll never believe&rdquo; or &ldquo;You&rsquo;ll never convince me&rdquo; or &ldquo;That&rsquo;s impossible&rdquo; or the classic &ldquo;I just can&rsquo;t believe&rdquo; we know there&rsquo;s further to go down the rabbit hole and it&rsquo;s not information that&rsquo;s holding the person back so much as denial. Terms such as those above are not learning phrases used by an open mind to expand the inner universe, but full stop rejections used to protect a closed mind under attack.<br />
<br />
An extremely important concept to understand about denial is that it&rsquo;s not an all or nothing proposition. There are multiple levels, degrees and side channels to denial. So when conflicts are overwhelming, we&rsquo;ll concede select points in order to keep others hidden. We&rsquo;re more than willing to lose a cognitive battle to win the denial war. And denial isn&rsquo;t black and white, but a hundred shades of gray. So to say someone&rsquo;s in denial doesn&rsquo;t mean they refuse to deal with everything, just certain select parts and subtle variations. <br />
<br />
The enabling power of the denial process is convincing ourselves we&rsquo;re not in denial. Thus it&rsquo;s imperative that we accept certain facts while others are colored or phase shifted to blur the lines in order to introduce a key ingredient of self deception, that of plausible deniability. In addition, we have a remarkable capacity to compartmentalize contrary pieces of information from each other and ourselves. This allows us to hold incompatible and contrary views or beliefs on the same subject at the same time and literally think nothing of it. <br />
<br />
<b>For Example</b><br />
<br />
A widely held and glaring example of inconsistent or contrary views is that after decades of abuse, many people now firmly believe their government (along with people in and out of the government) has repeatedly lied to them. They know their government will harm them, even going so far as to silence people by destroying them professionally or by reputation. Or even kill them if they present too much of a threat to power. Many now believe their government has repeatedly deceived them, fabricating &ldquo;evidence&rdquo; in order to drive the country into war or prolong and/or escalate war. <br />
<br />
They realize that the government manipulates statistics about the economy, including allowing companies to cook their books to show (better) profits through national security directives. That they now overtly and covertly manipulate domestic and foreign stock, currency, commodities and precious metals markets to further their goals. And that they do so under cover of national security, saying in effect that the more they meddle, the more they must continue to meddle. <br />
<br />
The government lies about the condition of the environment, the BP oil spill, national health issues, spying on its own citizens, torture and rendition, weapons of mass destruction, the list is endless. More and more people are beginning to comprehend that the government will rob the many to benefit the few and will hurt or kill those in its way. <br />
<br />
People not only don&rsquo;t trust the government, but they&rsquo;re down right frightened of the government and for good reason. They&rsquo;ve come to believe that the government is lethal to them, a remarkable admission considering it&rsquo;s such a deviation from the public myth they&rsquo;ve been indoctrinated into since grade school. This is a very sobering realization and one you&rsquo;d think would have <u>fully</u> shaken them awake. <br />
<br />
<b>The (Cognitive) Border is Closed</b><br />
<br />
But in many cases, people will only acknowledge emotionally difficult insights contingent upon rejecting others they consider far worse. This internal negotiation is carried out in a back room bargaining session with themselves, often with little awareness to guide the horse swapping other than a primal fear that&rsquo;s driving the urge to hide or get away. But ultimately where do we go when we live within, and depend upon, that which we fear? <br />
<br />
Most likely as a form of emotional self defense, many of these very same people desperately wish to believe their government (along with people in and out of the government) would never <u>willingly</u>ignore, encourage, support, promote or execute (false flag) attacks against its own citizens in order to further various goals or objectives, either private and/or governmental. <br />
<br />
In other words, they chose to believe there are moral, legal, and physical boundaries that those in government, as well as their political allies and (corporate) enablers, just won&rsquo;t cross. They in effect wish to believe that the sociopaths running the show will respect certain <u>select</u> moral and legal lines drawn in the sand by society and the governed. That the powerful in and out of government can and will kill a few, but not more than a few, that they will defend their hold on power, but only up to a certain point.<br />
<br />
These people admit the government may have crossed these lines in other countries in the past and may still cross them today. And that they might have crossed these lines here in America deep in the <u>distant</u> past. However, distant is usually measured as being longer than they&rsquo;ve been alive, thus making these transgressions emotionally safer. <br />
<br />
Remember again that the <u>perception</u> of personal risk or safety is a function of proximity to the risk. So the further away in time they can pretend the government has violated &ldquo;the rules&rdquo;, the lower the personal risk appears to the denier that the government might <b>again</b> violate &ldquo;the rules&rdquo;. This allows us to believe that our present administration is the softer kinder sociopathic version (44.0) and really doesn&rsquo;t have its citizens by the throat.<br />
<br />
Or maybe they need to be further from the fact that they were asleep at the wheel, ignoring the obvious or inevitable while it occurred and thus potentially responsible, even if only morally. After all, a popular public sport is to claim we didn&rsquo;t vote for so and so after the shit&rsquo;s hit the fan. People in denial are very keen to avoid personal responsibility that might lead them back to their own denial. <br />
<br />
Even after admitting all of the above, they still insist the government would never engage in this type of behavior <u>today</u> nor did it ever do so in the recent past, meaning within their adult lifetime. It would be too close for comfort otherwise and to seriously entertain this idea would overload and crash their cognitive process as well as their sense of personal safety. Thus the reason we read the &ldquo;I can&rsquo;t believe&rdquo; and &ldquo;You&rsquo;ll never convince me&rdquo; statements declaring a cognitive dissonant impasse and emotional safety. We all desire our comfort stories.<br />
<br />
This &ldquo;belief&rdquo; is glaringly inconsistent, logically suspect and strikingly narrow. And not surprising at all considering most of us still wish to believe we live in the America of our history books and public myth and not in a South American banana republic with nuclear weapons and a reserve currency. Perception <u>is</u> reality, thus I control what I believe and what I perceive.<br />
<br />
Which begs the obvious question? Whose line in the sand and what forbidden boundaries are we really talking about here? The ones we believe the government won&rsquo;t cross, the ones we don&rsquo;t wish to admit have recently been crossed or our own emotional boundaries, the ultimate do not enter stop sign? <br />
<br />
This is a reasonable question because a brief look at history offers up dozens of publicly disclosed examples of major lines in the sand repeatedly crossed by so called democratic or representative governments, including the USA on multiple occasions. I say this not to define who&rsquo;s right or wrong, but to declare under no uncertain terms that if we&rsquo;re not being consistent in our thinking, if we&rsquo;re unwilling to honesty assess all information at our disposal, if we&rsquo;re being selective in when we apply logic, that this <u>is</u> a major signal that there&rsquo;s denial blocking the way forward.<br />
<br />
<b>You Can&rsquo;t Make Me, You Can&rsquo;t <u>Make</u> Me</b><br />
<br />
For those who (understandably) can&rsquo;t accept such a horrifying thought and all its ugly implications, it&rsquo;s rejected outright as impossible or crazy. We can always come up with a thousand reasons or explanations to reject something in order to place as much emotional distance as we can between the frightening reality we&rsquo;re denying and ourselves. Again, one sees this all the time with posts that begin with &ldquo;You&rsquo;ll never make me believe&rdquo; or &ldquo;Nothing you show me will ever prove&rdquo; or &ldquo;I just can&rsquo;t believe&rdquo;. <br />
<br />
The person making these statements is declaring that any information contrary to their emotionally safer worldview will be promptly rejected without an unbiased assessment. This is not an open mind on display, but rather a mind whose steel trap is firmly welded shut. The information is too frightening to even be fairly considered, so it&rsquo;s rejected outright before it ever crosses the cognitive threshold.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;You&rsquo;ll never convince me&rdquo; is the sign that the mental deck is stacked. Yet after these people have finished the initial denial process and have regained their emotional composure, they consider themselves to be fair and open minded and willing to discuss anything, just as long as it&rsquo;s &ldquo;reasonable&rdquo;. They declare that any information that opens the emotionally uncomfortable box they just closed as crazy or unreasonable or unconfirmed or whatever it takes to keep the monster at bay. <br />
<br />
They make their own cognitive rules, which they then use to judge the quality and acceptability of the information. And the rules will always say this information isn&rsquo;t going to be allowed. It helps immensely if others in their social peer group as well as their leaders affirm their decision that some information&rsquo;s off limits. Thus we understand the critical need for leadership and its enablers to establish the public myth and to lie in public and on the record. <br />
<br />
This is done both in the run up to and after the limits have been violated and the lines crossed. Leadership declares for all who wish to believe the lie what&rsquo;s socially acceptable to believe and what&rsquo;s not. This is also the purpose of &ldquo;blue ribbon&rdquo; fact finding commissions, the so-called independent experts and authorities. Their primary job is to explore, modify and, after a few shocking &ldquo;mistakes&rdquo; have been revealed to allow us the fantasy they did a thorough job, ultimately bless the overall official public myth and lies. <br />
<br />
The person in denial is looking for permission or affirmation from an outside (of their own mind) authority that his or her denial is emotionally, socially and morally OK. Obviously, this doesn&rsquo;t apply to the sociopaths. When we&rsquo;re in emotional distress or acting in a morally or socially suspect manner, we seek comfort and affirmation from authority figures that we&rsquo;re in the clear and any guilt is unwarranted. This is why I often write &ldquo;Daddy, tell me another lie so I can believe it&rsquo;s the truth.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
Think back to when your own children were very young and they were emotionally insecure or afraid. They were especially eager for you to (re)affirm them in their own denial or to reassure them they were OK, particularly if it was about their own self image, stature or safety. Children aren&rsquo;t the only emotionally insecure people who wish to be reassured, particularly when they&rsquo;re in denial. <br />
<br />
At one time or another, we&rsquo;ve all been in a shaky relationship where we made the choice to accept a lie rather than face the truth. Since we all wish to believe we&rsquo;re strong and mature it&rsquo;s difficult to accept that we often act infantile and needy. Thus we&rsquo;ll even repress the understanding of that basic emotional need if awareness leaves us vulnerable. <br />
<br />
For those who don&rsquo;t engage in this level of denial, or more realistically don&rsquo;t admit they engage in this level of denial, my explanation sounds suspect and &ldquo;unreasonable&rdquo;. After all, well educated adults don&rsquo;t act this way. But this cognitive process is well understood, particularly by the psychological warfare and social control experts who use the knowledge of our inner disorder against us to manipulate and control. This is why I talk about knowing yourself. One can only be violated when one doesn&rsquo;t understand how and why it&rsquo;s occurring.<br />
<br />
These layers of subtle self bargaining and authority approval seeking are an example of the seductive and insidious nature of denial. And to the person employing it, it all sounds perfectly reasonable. How often do we see directly after the post &ldquo;I&rsquo;ll never be convinced&rdquo; the statement that &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not me that&rsquo;s the problem here because I&rsquo;m opened minded. It&rsquo;s you and your crazy information that&rsquo;s the issue.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Our worldview is constrained and maintained by ourselves, not by outside forces, regardless of the grand tales we tell ourselves about how fair and honest we are when viewing the world. A sympathetic soul might say &ldquo;We tell ourselves little white lies occasionally so what&rsquo;s the big deal? Everybody does it.&rdquo; <br />
<br />
This is precisely where denial begins, with little subtle deceptions that are &ldquo;harmless&rdquo; or &ldquo;inconsequential&rdquo;. We allow ourselves the comforting self deception that small lies don&rsquo;t lead to big ones and we can stop lying to ourselves any time we want. <br />
<br />
<b>Self Psyops and Propagandizing Oneself</b><br />
<br />
We have met the enemy and the enemy is us. This is why there&rsquo;s a never ending supply of fall guys and patsies pushed to the front of the public perception as foils and enablers for our own self deception. Why beat ourselves up when we can hate someone else. <br />
<br />
We&rsquo;re all desperate to some extent or another to deny a very basic reality. Psychological warfare is used against us by our government and private interests to manipulate and control, by our social control systems to pacify, maintain order and control, and by ourselves to deny and self deceive in order to live within the insanity and with ourselves. <br />
<br />
It&rsquo;s all about our individual and collective ego and our addiction to the natural dopamine high that supports and enables our denial. It feels <b><u>so</u></b> good to convincingly deny something that&rsquo;s emotionally painful. And that good feeling comes from our endless natural supply of emotional pain killers. The crazier it gets in our real world, the more we&rsquo;ll reach for the pain reliever that&rsquo;s just a small denial away. Psychological warfare leverages our own failings by exploiting the age old adage that you <b>can</b> con a dishonest man.<br />
<br />
An important part of individual denial is how it coordinates with society&rsquo;s collective denial. Again, this is what I mean when I talk about the public myth and the keepers of the public myth. We as a society maintain half truths and outright lies about our history and ourselves in order to brush aside uncomfortable dissonances and unpalatable facts. <br />
<br />
Our leaders lie to set the public myth in stone as well as to support prior or future lies. And once a lie is released by &ldquo;reputable authorities&rdquo;, the very fact that it exists and that it was recorded as &ldquo;truth&rdquo; because an &ldquo;authority&rdquo; spoke it, defies anyone to say otherwise. Are you calling the great and exalted authority a liar? Daddy doesn&rsquo;t lie, at least not to the kids.<br />
<br />
The public myth is always rigid and easily understood and many are deeply woven into our own personal worldview and belief system. &ldquo;They hate us for our freedom&rdquo; is one of the more egregious and nonsensical phrases that warms the cockles of our patriotic mythology. I wrote about this extensively in my &ldquo;Welcome to the Insane Asylum&rdquo; series as well as other articles.<br />
<br />
Even those who feel a sense of social responsibility and wish to do something to stop this are beginning to pull in their horns and hide from the coming storm. When they begin to understand that the government is no longer just a roadblock, but a potentially lethal enemy, they discover within themselves a bone rattling fear of their government, their presumed protector. <br />
<br />
This primal fear is something many people alive today have never experienced before. Sort of like waking one morning to discover that a mass murderer is sleeping next to you or down the hallway and across from the kids. <br />
<br />
These realizations about our government&rsquo;s motives and methods fly in the face of everything we&rsquo;ve been told. It contradicts our social conditioning and mythology about a somewhat benevolent but bumbling government that eventually gets it right. Infinitely worse, and thus ever more frightening, it places upon us total responsibility for our own life, happiness and wellbeing. No more playing the victim and no more excuses since Daddy isn&rsquo;t here to save us, but maybe even to kill us. <br />
<br />
<b>Don&rsquo;t Ask, Don&rsquo;t Tell</b><br />
<br />
But does this creeping realization that we can&rsquo;t trust our government anymore actually serve to feed our bias when it comes to The Crash? Since our instinct is to reject all official pronouncements and information coming from the government, is this tendency backfiring when it comes to our assessment of what&rsquo;s coming and how it will play out? <br />
<br />
In many respects, it doesn&rsquo;t make any difference whether the governments lies or not with regard to longevity and stability when every other government is doing likewise. Remember that while we might not trust the government, many still do. Even those who don&rsquo;t trust the government continue to act as if they do simply because it&rsquo;s in their own self interest. Combine this with the natural inertia of continuing on the same path and there&rsquo;s still plenty of momentum to keep this Ponzi churning for a long time. <br />
<br />
The obvious question here is, are we thinking clearly and unbiased when considering the economic and social disaster we expect is just around the corner. Personally I doubt it. As I pointed out in chapter one, it&rsquo;s easy to become biased and hard to recognize when we&rsquo;re emotionally involved. Often we&rsquo;re attracted to information that confirms our beliefs and regardless of how accurate it is, Zero Hedge and other contrary websites help us do this. <br />
<br />
Even if we&rsquo;re ultimately correct about the crash, it might make sense once in a while to check our assumptions. But do we really want to prove ourselves wrong? Naturally, we tell people (and ourselves) that we&rsquo;re willing to admit when we&rsquo;re wrong in order to maintain public (and internal) credibility. But often we engage in the illusion that we&rsquo;re double checking, just like we did during grade school to fool the teacher. <br />
<br />
If we&rsquo;re serious and really do check, we might find something we don&rsquo;t like which certainly won&rsquo;t please us. No one likes to contradict themselves, especially when we&rsquo;re emotionally involved. It&rsquo;s so much easier to say we checked and that everything&rsquo;s fine, then leave well enough alone. <br />
<br />
That might also be why we hang around Zero Hedge so much, to allow us the illusion that someone else is on the case. And why some get nervous when it goes off line for any extended period of time. Where&rsquo;s my ZH fix? Left alone without our constant spin and reassurance, doubt may seep in or we might start to drift from the message. Would we still be so resolute if Zero Hedge wasn&rsquo;t here?<br />
<br />
After all, on Zero Hedge we receive constant assurance that we&rsquo;re right and they&rsquo;re wrong. Plus we get to mingle with other like minded individuals, which lends us moral support and positive feedback. It&rsquo;s all right there and everything we need, delivered up in 10 to 15 articles a day and a dynamite comment section. We&rsquo;re in Nirvana, also known as our own little contrary universe.<br />
<br />
Zero Hedge has just as much bias as CNBC, just in a different direction. Remember that the term bias doesn&rsquo;t measure accuracy, just direction, momentum or magnitude. That&rsquo;s just a statement of fact and not a condemnation of ZH or any other contrary website. One must always understand and compensate for the basis and bias of any information we consume. Just read the Zero Hedge disclosure.<br />
<br />
Are we willing to subject our view of the coming crash to as rigid an examination as we do the Ponzi view? Or do we just assume the Ponzi is lying and declare anything opposite the lie must be the truth and the &ldquo;real&rdquo; reality? Is the real reality what we believe it &ldquo;should&rdquo; be or what it really &ldquo;is&rdquo; day to day? <br />
<br />
Why do we think the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; will prevail? That&rsquo;s not a foregone conclusion by any stretch of the imagination. Nor that exposing the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; will sink the lie that&rsquo;s supposedly supporting the economy when it&rsquo;s clearly in nearly everyone&rsquo;s short term best interest to lie and live another day. Does &ldquo;truth&rdquo; always prevail or is that just another part of our individual and collective myth by way of our grade school conditioning and indoctrination? Here comes Mighty Mouse to save the day.<br />
<br />
Why would we possibly think people are motivated not only to learn the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; but then live the truth? My personal life experience doesn&rsquo;t support this supposition though I will admit it&rsquo;s one of my comfort stories. <br />
<br />
More to the point, the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; will not force the government to stop promoting a lie when to do so will put people in physical, emotional and financial peril, not to mention the leadership. We all understand that at times it&rsquo;s so much easier to maintain the lie than to finally begin to speak the truth. So much needs to be undone and explained so why even try?<br />
<br />
The government creates crisis after crisis to frighten the herd. And based upon every cowboy movie I&rsquo;ve ever seen, stampeding herds just want the fear to go away. To think that at some point there will be such an overwhelming outcry from the public that the sociopaths will cease and desist and perp walk themselves to jail is beyond childish. Frogs in the bottom of a pot brought slowly to a boil don&rsquo;t do much of anything other than complain about the weather. <br />
<br />
Now that <u>we</u> know the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; and are some of the early adopters, are we <u>acting</u> to support the truth and stop the lies or are we just cueing up for another ZH expos&eacute;? Why do we expect others to act differently than we have acted once they learn the &ldquo;truth&rdquo;? <br />
<br />
I&rsquo;ve asked this question a few times before here on ZH as well as other places and I&rsquo;m mostly ignored. It appears I&rsquo;m cutting too close to the bone because while most won&rsquo;t admit it, we seem to be waiting around for someone else to do what we don&rsquo;t wish to do. <br />
<br />
We claim to have truth and justice on our side, but just knowing the truth doesn&rsquo;t stop the lies. There seems to be this belief that once the &ldquo;truth&rdquo; becomes widely known, reinforcements will swell the ranks and then we can strike at the belly of the beast. I suspect this is just another comfort story we tell ourselves in order to sleep better at night. And that this dissonance between what we say and what we do feeds into our collective denial.<br />
<br />
Even better (worse?), do we claim the moral high ground where all is sacred and self questioning is blasphemy? I fully understand the importance of declaring the emperor to be naked, but the sociopaths <u>deduct</u> points for truth and they have control of the reins and the game. Righteous indignation, something we love to revel in, has throughout the ages covered up a lot of bad thinking by the so called good guys.<br />
<br />
<b>Inconsistent Inconsistencies</b><br />
<br />
An example of an inconsistency in our thinking might be that the Ponzi has lasted much longer than many predicted it would. Very few on ZH considered the possibility in March of 09 that the stock market would be <b>much</b> higher a year and a half later. It was obvious systemic death was just around the corner, right? <br />
<br />
Even fewer believed the US, British and EU governments and central banks could have repeatedly issued multiple trillions of dollars in sovereign debt and Treasury paper in multiple currencies at ever decreasing interest rates without a currency crisis and collapse. And yet that&rsquo;s precisely what they&rsquo;ve successfully done if success is measured as paper issuance and no collapse. <br />
<br />
Or maybe the dissonance can be found within the precious metals arena. While there were some who felt otherwise, many people were convinced that once the public was told of the Federal Reserve&rsquo;s Gold price suppression techniques that the Gold paper trade would collapse. And yet it continues to this day, even if it&rsquo;s hobbled to some extent. How can that be? <br />
<br />
Lately I&rsquo;ve heard the explanation that there wasn&rsquo;t <b>enough</b> public exposure of Gold manipulation to cause collapse. While that sounds reasonable, won&rsquo;t the public ignore what they don&rsquo;t want to hear no matter the quantity or quality of evidence? You can bring the horse to water but&hellip;.<br />
<br />
I agree that it defies common sense that a market as manipulated and undercapitalized with actual physical Gold wouldn&rsquo;t disintegrate the moment the news of manipulation hit Bloomberg. And yet it didn&rsquo;t disintegrate and still functions today. Is this not an aberration that must be carefully examined? It seems we&rsquo;re incrementally increasing our denial as the Ponzi marches on.<br />
<br />
All I see people doing is pushing back the expected date of collapse, saying next time there&rsquo;s a run on Comex or the Chinese want more physical or more tungsten is found inside 400 ounce bars, then it will collapse. Even if it does collapse, what comes next? When only Gold has perceived value, it would be foolish to think the sociopaths will allow us to keep ours. Think about that and then read some history. The insanity isn&rsquo;t extinguished; it ebbs and flows or just morphs into new bodies and forms.<br />
<br />
We continue to brush aside multiple contradictions to the quick collapse scenario without seriously considering this could continue on for <u>many</u> more years. Some may not wish to recognize this, but those who understand what&rsquo;s going on, meaning the principal supporters and benefactors of the Ponzi (both on Wall and Main Street) will cling to the devil they know rather than face the black abyss of the unknown. This alone assures a much longer unraveling than we&rsquo;re acknowledging. <br />
<br />
I&rsquo;m not taking &ldquo;sides&rdquo; in this argument as much as I&rsquo;m asking a more fundamental question. Are <b>we</b> taking a side and then ignoring evidence that might prove us incorrect? The more our argument for the crash or a collapse can withstand critical scrutiny and the more we probe and dissect its weaknesses, the stronger it becomes unless it&rsquo;s weak or baseless. <br />
<br />
However, the more we shield our argument from scrutiny, either by overt or covert denial, obstruction or obscuration, the weaker it becomes. This method of interrogation is how we pummel the Ponzi, by relentlessly questioning its suppositions and evidence. Shouldn&rsquo;t we apply the same acid test to our own arguments or is our only claim to fame simply that since we proved them wrong, we must be right?<br />
<br />
<b>Shoot the Messenger, Ignore the Message</b><br />
<br />
What&rsquo;s obvious to you and me is rarely obvious to others, not because it can&rsquo;t be seen, but because it can be ignored and rejected. The same can be said in reverse. Many people, including this author, are at times irritated with certain contributors and commentators and their barrage of articles and comments on Zero Hedge that seem to defy the laws of common sense. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;You live in a fantasy world&rdquo; or &ldquo;Sooner or later you&rsquo;ll be crushed&rdquo; are all common refrains left to refute these people. I&rsquo;m not saying the comments are or aren&rsquo;t valid. But we <b>must</b> ask ourselves some questions if we&rsquo;re to face our own emotional outbursts. Are we angry with the authors because they&rsquo;re delusional or because they represent everything and everyone that&rsquo;s holding this Ponzi together and precisely the reason it&rsquo;s lasted longer than we expected? Maybe we&rsquo;re holding it together ourselves?<br />
<br />
These authors are an emotional and intellectual trigger for many here on Zero Hedge. Rather than rant at them, we should step back and examine why we&rsquo;re being triggered. Often we yell and scream in order to hide from self examination. Is that what&rsquo;s going on here? I suspect that for many it&rsquo;s not the money that&rsquo;s upsetting, but instead a sense of bloody outrage over the magnitude of the thieving and the colossal gall exhibited by the principal sorcerers that&rsquo;s clouding our vision.<br />
<br />
Once we look within and understand the trigger, we can discover the underlying dissonance that&rsquo;s obscuring our worldview and beliefs. I know that when I experience an emotional outburst, particularly when I&rsquo;m feeling righteous indignation, this is a clear indication I&rsquo;ve been triggered and that something&rsquo;s unsettled within. <br />
<br />
It could be seen as a huge blow to our ego to admit that it might be time to hunt within for some inner truth when the streets are filled with the thieves and the complicit. But I know if we continue to be triggered, we&rsquo;ll be easily manipulated and seriously out of balance. Only when we&rsquo;re at peace with ourselves can we be effective in all other aspects of our life.  <br />
<br />
When we&rsquo;re triggered, rather than get caught up in the details of the information being argued, we should be looking closely at what we fear or what we&rsquo;re avoiding that&rsquo;s causing such an outburst. We&rsquo;re angry that the Ponzi uses diversionary tactics to distract and bluff the public from the &ldquo;truth&rdquo;. Yet we use the very same tactics on ourselves rather than take a long hard look within. Maybe some personal housekeeping is in order? <br />
<br />
Admittedly this is a difficult task and it requires self confidence and discipline to pull back and pause when our ego is screaming for us to &ldquo;do something&rdquo; to defend our ego honor or ego self respect. When we&rsquo;ve been emotionally triggered and we&rsquo;re upset over something that was written or said, what&rsquo;s really going on here, what&rsquo;s really been triggered is our sense that our worldview is under assault. This is precisely when we must calm down and reach within to find the courage to look deeper into what&rsquo;s going on. <br />
<br />
<b>The Abuser/Abused Paradigm</b><br />
<br />
The reason I always talk about our ego not being &ldquo;us&rdquo;, but rather a separate and distinct entity, is because we&rsquo;re constantly led to believe by our ego that our ego is our friend and can be fully trusted. Our ego accomplishes this by convincing us that our ego is &ldquo;us&rdquo; and that &ldquo;we&rdquo; are one and the same as our ego. Thus we believe that when our ego is talking, in fact it&rsquo;s &ldquo;us&rdquo; that&rsquo;s talking. <br />
<br />
As I said in Chapter One, this is hardly the case. The ego considers itself to be a separate and sovereign entity, not a part of &ldquo;us&rdquo;. Thus the ego is not bound by any moral, emotional or social boundaries nor does &ldquo;it&rdquo; feel constrained from lying, cheating or using subterfuge to get what it wants. Since our ego doesn&rsquo;t physically control our bodies, it must use manipulative methods (essentially self psyops or self propaganda) to achieve its goals.<br />
<br />
In a remarkable example of how the fabric and structure of our society and social order mimics our <u>internal</u> disorder, the control system (the Ponzi, the banking cabal aka the Federal Reserve and other central/commercial banks, the political and justice systems, the so called free press aka main stream media, religions, corporations, academia and the education system etc) does exactly the same thing to us externally as our ego does internally. And for the most part we fully participate in this.<br />
<br />
Using subterfuge and illusion as well as encouraging our own self deception, the control system convinces us that it&rsquo;s &ldquo;our&rdquo; control system. We&rsquo;re told that the decision to send &ldquo;our&rdquo; troops (I didn&rsquo;t know I had an army) into foreign wars is &ldquo;our&rdquo; decision and in &ldquo;our&rdquo; best interest. That it&rsquo;s &ldquo;our&rdquo; government despite the fact that &ldquo;our&rdquo; government doesn&rsquo;t act in &ldquo;our&rdquo; best interest. We&rsquo;re repeatedly told that &ldquo;we&rdquo; must save &ldquo;our&rdquo; too-big-to-fail banks in order to save &ldquo;ourselves&rdquo; from those very same too-big-to-fail banks. <br />
<br />
The main stream media, an integral part of the control system, assures &ldquo;us&rdquo; that &ldquo;we&rdquo; must protect and enable &ldquo;our&rdquo; financial elites and &ldquo;our&rdquo; government so that they may employ and protect &ldquo;us&rdquo;. If the financial elites are treated poorly by &ldquo;us&rdquo; taxpayers, they&rsquo;ll take their ball and go home and &ldquo;we&rdquo; shall starve. <br />
<br />
Yet for decades we&rsquo;ve been assured they&rsquo;ll trickle down some of what we give them so I guess it&rsquo;s all good folks. Yet the income and wealth disparity continues to grow to new records each year. Without judging the validity of my statements, understand what&rsquo;s really going on here. <br />
<br />
We the (self) abused have been and are being conditioned to love and cherish our abuser. Or at least tolerate it. <i><u>Whack!</u></i> &ldquo;Thank you very much sir. May I have another?&rdquo; <i><u>Whack!</u></i> To tolerate such a disparity without revolt takes a great deal of emotional and intellectual bargaining and denial. <br />
<br />
Of course, this doesn&rsquo;t apply to you and me because we understand what&rsquo;s going on, right? I hear this all the time on ZH, that we&rsquo;re the informed and thus immune. Is this another comfort story we tell ourselves or are we just caught in the emotional headlights and frozen in our tracks?<br />
<br />
<b>The Big Bang or the Little Whimper</b><br />
<br />
So, what if &ldquo;it&rdquo; doesn&rsquo;t end with a bang but with a whimper? I believe this unraveling can and will go on <u>much</u> longer than we expect and we should plan accordingly. Since no one really wants our way of life to end, many will subtly and covertly maintain it even if it means they must maintain the lie. And that&rsquo;s the key to a slow and painful death of the Ponzi rather than a collapse. <br />
<br />
As was so wonderfully illustrated in &ldquo;The Matrix&rdquo;, nearly all of the population will fight to remain within the lie for as long as they can simply because the alternative is too horrible to accept. For them, to lie is to live. So they&rsquo;ll bargain away anything they can&rsquo;t maintain and deny the pain for as long as they can. <br />
<br />
Like walking down a staircase, only when forced will they accept another step down into the abyss. Once there, they&rsquo;ll acclimate all over again using the only coping tools they have, those of denial and bargaining. Then they&rsquo;ll take the next step and the next step and the next step in a slow walk to hell.<br />
<br />
For those who have forgotten, history&rsquo;s littered with failed Empires, some as recently as 65 years ago. The one constant throughout history is that the citizens of those failed empires lived in great denial of their current condition and they slowly bargained away their souls for another day in misery. This doesn&rsquo;t need to be, but it usually is anyway. <br />
<br />
While we as a society and a collective are slowly relinquishing our sovereignty to the powers that be, the one area that is under our complete control is our own mind. Let&rsquo;s not cede that as well by blindly following our own contrarian herd. <br />
<br />
We should not adopt positions or beliefs that oppose the Ponzi simply because it&rsquo;s contrary to the Ponzi. Doing so just shifts the illusion of control to us, but still leaves us dancing to the Ponzi beat. Our views should be adopted only after rigorous examination and vetting. This is the only way to a truly peaceful, free and sovereign life.<br />
<br />
09/05/2010<br />
<br />
Cognitive Dissonance<br />
<br />
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/kLta_-BOXOU" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/kLta_-BOXOU/what-if-%E2%80%9Cit%E2%80%9D-doesn%E2%80%99t-end-bang-whimper-mind-games-chapter-two-two" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>ZeroHedge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13723-what-if-doesn-t-end-bang-but-whimper-mind-games-chapter-two.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Summary Of Global Events In The Week Ahead</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13722-summary-global-events-week-ahead.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hxVQ1ZqZWeeziZRJEL2TwWjvm_4/0/di  (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hxVQ1ZqZWeeziZRJEL2TwWjvm_4/0/da)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hxVQ1ZqZWeeziZRJEL2TwWjvm_4/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hxVQ1ZqZWeeziZRJEL2TwWjvm_4/0/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hxVQ1ZqZWeeziZRJEL2TwWjvm_4/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/hxVQ1ZqZWeeziZRJEL2TwWjvm_4/1/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Summer is over, and now the real scramble for performance begins with just 3 weeks left in the quarter. Here is a look at the key economic events in the upcoming week, from around the world.<br />
<br />
<i>From Thomas Stolper and Mark Tan at Goldman Sachs</i><br />
<br />
<b>Week Ahead</b><br />
<br />
Summer comes to a close and markets swing back into full gear again following the Labour day weekend in the US. The political temperature in Europe, latest round of Eurozone IP data and China data at the end of the week will be in focus. We also get a few interesting central bank meetings from around the world.<br />
<br />
<b>Post summer blues in the Eurozone? </b>We&rsquo;ll be watching closely for signs of rising political tension in the Eurozone, with the upcoming few weeks critical in gauging the political risks surrounding the pending implementation of key reforms in a number of Eurozone countries. The first milestone will be the September 7th general strikes planned in France in response to a parliamentary debate about the much needed increase of the retirement age. The potential for negative headlines and rising political uncertainty is one of the reasons why we have been cautious not to sound the all clear for the Euro just yet. Outside of this, we think fundamentals (relative cyclical growth outlook, structural impediments in the US and the BBoP picture etc) still point to considerable support for EUR/$ strength, as reflected in our 6 and 12 months forecasts of 1.35 and 1.38 respectively. We&rsquo;ll also get the latest on the cyclical momentum in the Eurozone with the first batch of hard data for Q3 in the form of IP data. We expect the industrial recovery to have continued across the Eurozone, but the moderation in momentum we have seen in the surveys will likely also translate into slightly softer IP growth going forward.<br />
<br />
<b>Central bank meetings </b>Australia, Canada, Korea, South Africa, Peru, Japan and the UK all hold central bank meetings this week. Our Australia economists are looking for a possible hawkish shift in tone for the RBA this week, reflecting the stronger activity recently. We are still expecting 100bps of hikes over the next year (with 25bps to come in November, although we are not ruling out October). This is considerably more hawkish than market pricing and is the rationale behind our recently initiated trade recommendation to pay AUD rates via 5Y swaps. In Canada, we are expecting a 25bps hike, in-line with consensus. We will be focused on the accompanying statement, which could be dovish given the recent downside risks for the US outlook. In Japan, we are not expecting any major surprises from the BoJ after having just announced their additional easing measures last week.<br />
<br />
<b>China data </b>We&rsquo;ll get trade data and possibly money and credit data starting on Friday. For trade, we expect August exports growth to fall by around 2% and imports growth to remain largely unchanged on a yoy basis (the implied mom annualized growth rates are -10% for both exports and imports). Meanwhile, the trade surplus is likely to remain high. Money and credit growth should likely show a modest rebound in both yoy and mom terms in August. The slew of monthly Chinese activity data also comes the following week, which will allow our China economists a clearer read on the risks to their current 2010 GDP forecasts.<br />
<br />
<b>Monday 6th</b><br />
<br />
<b>US bank holiday</b><br />
<br />
<b>Tuesday 7th<br />
<br />
</b><b>BoJ meeting </b>We do not expect any major announcements here given the additional easing measures announced last week.<br />
<br />
<b>RBA meeting </b>In view of the strength of the recent domestic data on GDP and retail sales, we expect the RBA to shift its rhetoric to a more hawkish tone at some stage over the next few weeks. Our central view is that a November rate hike is most likely the next step in the tightening cycle, but an earlier move in October cannot be ruled out.<br />
<br />
<b>German manufacturing orders (Jul) </b>We expect a decline of -0.5%mom after a +3.2% rise last month.<br />
<br />
<b>General Strike in France </b>Given the latest announcements from trade unions, large parts of public services, including public transport are at risk of being shut down for 24 hours, while the French parliament starts debating the planned pension reforms.<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Wednesday 8th</b><br />
<br />
<b>Japan machinery orders (Jul) </b>Recovery is very slow for machinery orders (private-sector orders excluding shipping and electric power), which are a leading indicator for capex. We only forecast a flat mom path in July after a 1.6% rise in June.<br />
<br />
<b>German and Spain IP (Jul)</b> We expect IP to have grown by +0.5%mom in the former, and 0.3%mom in the latter.<br />
<br />
<b>Bank of Canada meeting </b>We continue to forecast a 25bp hike (in-line with consensus), although our conviction level is not especially high given the recent deterioration in the growth news (particularly in the US).<br />
<br />
<b>Fed beige book </b>This survey of regional economic conditions will provide a cross-check on recent economic indicators, which have begun to surprise to the upside relative to downgraded forecasts.<br />
<br />
Our September FX Monthly publication is scheduled for release<br />
<br />
<b>Thursday 9th</b><br />
<br />
<b>Korea central bank meeting </b>Our forecast is for at most another 25-bp hike in 2010, in either September or October. Our baseline scenario remains a 25-bp hike in October but we do not rule out a September hike, given the hawkish comments from Bank of Korea officials.<br />
<br />
<b>Bank of England </b>meeting No change to rates expected.<br />
<br />
<b>South Africa central bank meeting </b>We expect a 50bps cut in rates to 6%, in-line with consensus.<br />
<br />
<b>US trade balance (Jul) </b>The deficit in June (-$49.9bn) was much deeper than the second-quarter average. Our estimate for July is for only a slight narrowing to -$48bn, suggesting downside risk to the trade contribution to third-quarter GDP growth.<br />
<br />
<b>US initial claims </b>Consensus expects stabilization at +470k following the fall to +472k last week.<br />
<br />
<b>Peru central bank meeting </b>We expect a 50bps hike to 3%, in-line with consensus<br />
<br />
<b>Friday 10th</b><br />
<br />
<b>Australia employment report (Aug) </b>This month's jobs survey will be distorted by hirings associated with the holding of the Federal Election in the month. Though it is hard to be precise, prior elections have also resulted in a noticeable lift in participation, which we suspect will prevent a big fall in the unemployment rate. We are expecting +55k of jobs added vs consensus of +25k. We expect the unemployment rate to stay at 5.3% vs consensus of 5.2%.<br />
<br />
<b>China Money and credit (Aug)  </b>(Sep 10-15) We expect money and credit growth to show a modest rebound in both yoy and mom terms in August.<br />
<br />
<b>China Trade (Aug)</b> We expect August exports growth to fall by around 2% and imports growth to remain largely unchanged on a yoy basis ( which would imply sequential mom growth rates of -10% annualized for both exports and imports ). Meanwhile, the trade surplus is likely to remain high.<br />
<br />
<b>France and Italy IP (Jul) </b>We expect +0.6%mom in France and +0.4% in Italy.<br />
<br />
<b>Canada employment report (Aug) </b>Consensus is expecting a +17.8k increase in jobs from -9.3k previously. Unemployment rate expected unchanged at 8%.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/V3YaQrPgGns" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/V3YaQrPgGns/summary-global-events-week-ahead" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>ZeroHedge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13722-summary-global-events-week-ahead.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Will Greece Exit the Eurozone?</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13721-will-greece-exit-eurozone.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:51:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BTSYu1CqKuNjWFUzEXk2HgcAZLc/0/di  (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BTSYu1CqKuNjWFUzEXk2HgcAZLc/0/da)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BTSYu1CqKuNjWFUzEXk2HgcAZLc/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BTSYu1CqKuNjWFUzEXk2HgcAZLc/0/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BTSYu1CqKuNjWFUzEXk2HgcAZLc/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BTSYu1CqKuNjWFUzEXk2HgcAZLc/1/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_qFiyjwMlP0Y/TIP5Z0DnbNI/AAAAAAAAB7g/RO2Cg0THDT4/s1600/destination_greece_header.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_qFiyjwMlP0Y/TIP5Z0DnbNI/AAAAAAAAB7g/RO2Cg0THDT4/s400/destination_greece_header.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><b><i><a href="http://pensionpulse.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Via Pension Pulse.</a></i></b><br />
<br />
Helena Smith reports in the Guardian, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/sep/05/debt-crisis-europeanbanks" target="_blank">Exit from eurozone is Greece's worst option, says Jean-Claude Trichet</a>:<br />
<blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Greece's  exit from the eurozone would be the "worst possible option", Europe's   central bank chief said at the weekend amid concerns over the   debt-stricken country's ability to pull itself out of crisis.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Ahead   of a crucial week for George Papandreou, the prime minister, with   threats of renewed civil unrest over government austerity policies in   the run-up to the leader's keynote annual economic speech, the ECB   president sought to squash speculation that Athens' only solution was to   revert to the drachma.</b><br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
"We created the euro  to achieve the  single market for the prosperity and stability of  Europe," Jean-Claude  Trichet said at a meeting of prominent political  and business leaders  on the shores of Italy's Lake Como. "The national  governments have to  take care of their own national competitiveness  within the euro area."<br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
<b>The  Greek administration has won widespread  praise for implementing an  unprecedented belt-tightening programme of  tax hikes, wage and pension  cuts in return for a three-year, &euro;110bn  (&pound;92bn) package of emergency  aid from the IMF</b> and eurozone nations.<br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
Without the rescue loans, the EU member state would have defaulted on its sovereign debt in May.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>At   a conference marking his socialist Pasok party's foundation,  Papandreou  insisted that Greeks, who are experiencing their first  recession in 16  years, were on course to not only exiting the crisis  but emerging much  stronger for it.</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>But  his government has also been criticised for  failing to move fast  enough to enact reforms spurring growth and  development, seen as vital  to kick-start the economy. Despite the  measures, revenue intake has  also remained off-target.</b><br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
With  borrowing costs for the nation  back at the record levels that preceded  the bailout &ndash; and public anger  over austerity measures poised, with  summer's end, to spill onto the  streets &ndash; leading economists are again  questioning whether Greece can  weather the storm.<br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
Galloping unemployment has helped fuel fears that the country is heading for an unparalleled winter of discontent.<br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
An   MRB poll  revealed that an overwhelming 81.7% of the population  believe  the ruling socialists will soon be forced to resort to yet  tougher  measures, while nearly 46% think it likely that Greece would  become  bankrupt.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Highlighting the  scepticism surrounding Greek efforts to  solve the crisis, the head of  Germany's prestigious thinktank IFO  Institute, Hans-Werner Sinn,  predicted that further austerity would push  the nation to the brink of  "civil war".</b><br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
The "least bad" option, he said, would be for Athens to drop the common currency.<br />
<br />
"The   policy of forced 'internal devaluation,' deflation and depression  could  risk driving Greece to the edge of civil war," Sinn told the  gathering  of political and business leaders in Italy. "It is impossible  to cut  wages by 30% without major riots &hellip; Greece would have been  bankrupt  without the rescue. All the alternatives are terrible, but the  least  terrible is for the country to get out of the eurozone, even if  this  kills the Greek banks."<br />
<br />
</blockquote>Indeed, Mr. Sinn's dire forecasts have garnered much attention. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard reports in the Telegraph, <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/7980291/EU-austerity-policies-risk-civil-war-in-Greece-warns-top-German-economist-Dr-Sinn.html" target="_blank">EU austerity policies risk civil war in Greece, warns top German economist Dr Sinn</a>:<br />
<blockquote><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
 &ldquo;This tragedy does not have a solution,&rdquo; said Hans-Werner Sinn, head of    the prestigious IFO Institute in Munich. <br />
<br />
<br />
        <br />
<br />
<b>&ldquo;The  policy of forced 'internal devaluation', deflation, and depression     could risk driving Greece to the edge of a civil war. It is impossible  to    cut wages and prices by  30pc without major riots,&rdquo; he said,  speaking at the    elite European House Ambrosetti forum at Lake Como. </b><br />
<br />
     <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Greece would have been bankrupt without the rescue measures. All the     alternatives are terrible but the least terrible is for the country to  get    out of the eurozone, even if this kills the Greek banks,&rdquo; he  said. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Dr Sinn said Greece is an entirely different case from  Spain and Portugal,    which still have manageable public debts and can  bring their public finances    back into line with higher taxes.  <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
&ldquo;Greece would have defaulted in the period between April 28 and May 7,     had the money not been promised by the European Union,&rdquo; he said,  describing the    failure of the  EU&rsquo;s bail-out strategy to include a  haircut for the    banks as an invitation to  moral hazard. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
&ldquo;There should be a quasi-insolvency procedure for countries. Creditors  have    to accept a haircut before any money flows for rescue plans,  otherwise we&rsquo;ll    never have debt discipline in the eurozone,&rdquo; he said.  <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
<b>Greek society has so far  held together well, despite a wave of strikes and    street violence in  the early months of the crisis. However, unemployment is    rising fast  and political fatigue with such austerity policies typically    sets in  the second year.     </b><br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Under the rescue deal, the eurozone  pledged &euro;80bn of new loans at 5pc interest    and the International  Monetary Fund offered a further &euro;30bn. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
<b>The  joint bail-out was hoped to safeguard Greece against the pressure from     global capital markets for two and half years, but the relief rally  proved    short. Spreads on longer-term Greek government debt have  surged back to    crisis levels of about 800 basis points, implying a  high risk of default.      </b><br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
<b>&ldquo;We are in the second Greek crisis right now, today,&rdquo; said Dr Sinn.</b> <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Greece is undergoing what amounts to an IMF austerity package but  without the    IMF cure of debt restructuring or devaluation that usual  for a country with    a spiralling public debt and a chronic loss of  competitiveness. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
The IMF says Greece&rsquo;s debt will rise to 150pc  by 2013-2014 even if Athens    complies fully, a strategy viewed as  self-defeating by several ex-IMF    officials. There is a strong  suspicion that the real objective is to    bail-out North European banks  with heavy exposure to Southern Europe, rather    help Greece. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
<b>Dr  Sinn said the Germany is now was super-competitive after clawing back  18pc    in competitiveness during its long slump. &ldquo;We&rsquo;re in a new phase     of history. The toggle switch has turned and we are going to see a  mirror    image of the last 15 years. This time it is Germany that will  have an    internal boom,&rdquo; he said.     </b><br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Germans will not recyle their savings in the Club Med region. They will invest    at home. <br />
<br />
<br />
 <br />
 </blockquote> <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
 <br />
<br />
Will  Greece exit the eurozone and will this wreak havoc on global financial  markets? Part of me longs for the good old years of drachmas. Things  were much simpler back then.  Whenever they ran into economic jams, the  government would devalue the drachma.<br />
<br />
But the drachma was a joke  and so was Greece's competitiveness during those nutty devaluation  years. I agree with Prime Minister Papandreou,  Greece will emerge  stronger after this crisis, but at what social and economic cost? The  government needs to focus more on growth and it needs to start thinking  outside the box. For example, it can leverage off its ties with Russia  to explore oil in the Aegean or better yet, look at developing renewable  energy with China who is already a big player in developing Greek  shipping ports. Greece needs to create jobs and it needs a long-term  plan to diversify away from tourism and shipping.<br />
<br />
I am off to  visit my sister and family in Greece. My destination is Crete. I will be  blogging off and on, but my focus will be less on bond vigilantes and  more on family and relaxing in one of the most beautiful places on  earth. Below, a little taste of paradise, and if you ever visit, you'll  understand why Greece and Greeks will survive any crisis that comes  their way.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/pGrkwIIGkYo" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/pGrkwIIGkYo/will-greece-exit-eurozone" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>ZeroHedge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13721-will-greece-exit-eurozone.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Non Farm Payrolls: The Devil Is In the Adjustments</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13720-non-farm-payrolls-devil-adjustments.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[When the US government announced a 'better than expected' headline growth number   in its non farm payrolls report for August, a loss of 'only'...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>When the US government announced a 'better than expected' headline growth number   in its non farm payrolls report for August, a loss of 'only' 54,000 jobs versus   a forecasted loss of 120,000 jobs, people had to wonder, 'How do they do it? We   do not see any of this growth and recovery in our day to day   activity.'    Here's one way that those reporting the numbers can 'tinker'   with them to produce the desired results.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22460.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13720-non-farm-payrolls-devil-adjustments.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[America's Economic Nightmare Is Just Beginning]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13719-americas-economic-nightmare-just-beginning.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>David Michael Green  writes: In the 1930s, the only thing we had to fear was fear, itself.  Today, the main thing we have to   fear is us, ourselves....</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>David Michael Green  writes: In the 1930s, the only thing we had to fear was fear, itself.  Today, the main thing we have to   fear is us, ourselves.  Looking out over the horizon, I'm   starting to wonder just how many shades of dark there are on the pallette.    Lately, I get the feeling that we're about to find out.  <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22455.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13719-americas-economic-nightmare-just-beginning.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Economic Insane Asylum</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13718-economic-insane-asylum.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>In a Nutshell: Our economy is really an insane asylum run by lunatics.Common Sense: No problem can be fixed before a solution is   formed. No...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In a Nutshell: Our economy is really an insane asylum run by lunatics.Common Sense: No problem can be fixed before a solution is   formed. No solution can be formed until the underlying problems are clearly   identified.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22456.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13718-economic-insane-asylum.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The One Thing That Could Tank Gold Prices</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13717-one-thing-could-tank-gold-prices.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[As I dug deeper into the inner workings of the economy I became convinced   that most of it was &ndash; like the housing industry &ndash; a house of...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As I dug deeper into the inner workings of the economy I became convinced   that most of it was &ndash; like the housing industry &ndash; a house of cards.Diversification for me boiled down to just a few things that I can have faith   in. I'm not alone in this camp, I've heard Eric Sprott speak about this as   well.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22457.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13717-one-thing-could-tank-gold-prices.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>More Economic Stimulus to Fix Unemployment?</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13716-more-economic-stimulus-fix-unemployment.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[In a recent WSJ article titled &ldquo;Romer Calls for More Stimulus&rdquo; Romer stated that the   government has the tools to fix unemployment and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In a recent WSJ article titled &ldquo;Romer Calls for More Stimulus&rdquo; Romer stated that the   government has the tools to fix unemployment and that we need more stimulus.Another article in Yahoo quoted her stating that the government must lower   taxes.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22458.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13716-more-economic-stimulus-fix-unemployment.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[HP`s 3PAR Acquisition Makes Strategic & Financial Sense]]></title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13715-hp-s-3par-acquisition-makes-strategic-financial-sense.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The 3PAR saga finally came to a close on Sep. 2 with Dell Inc. (DELL) beaten by   Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ) in an 18-day bidding war. The final price...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The 3PAR saga finally came to a close on Sep. 2 with Dell Inc. (DELL) beaten by   Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ) in an 18-day bidding war. The final price tag of 3PAR   is at $33 a share, or $2.35 billion, almost twice Dell&rsquo;s initial offer at $18 a   share last month.     So, does this acquisition make sense for HP? <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22459.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13715-hp-s-3par-acquisition-makes-strategic-financial-sense.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Middle East Conflict Costs Region $12 Trillion Over 20 Years</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13714-middle-east-conflict-costs-region-12-trillion-over-20-years.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The Internet has provided the world with, if nothing else, instantaneous access   to news and in-depth information previously available only to...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The Internet has provided the world with, if nothing else, instantaneous access   to news and in-depth information previously available only to governments and   think tanks. It has also allowed for the exchange of data and analyses between   groups and individuals around the globe, in part by making one tongue, English,   the language of the World Wide Web. It remains to be seen whether the keystroke   is mightier than the sword.  <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article22454.html" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>The Market Oracle</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13714-middle-east-conflict-costs-region-12-trillion-over-20-years.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Coxe Advisors Discusses A Fizzling Recovery, And Explains Why The Market Is Essential</title>
			<link>http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13713-coxe-advisors-discusses-fizzling-recovery-explains-why-market-essential.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KxzwLFZpzvQhInwvVjeqCIUwKcM/0/di  (http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KxzwLFZpzvQhInwvVjeqCIUwKcM/0/da)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KxzwLFZpzvQhInwvVjeqCIUwKcM/0/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KxzwLFZpzvQhInwvVjeqCIUwKcM/0/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KxzwLFZpzvQhInwvVjeqCIUwKcM/1/da" target="_blank"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KxzwLFZpzvQhInwvVjeqCIUwKcM/1/di" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
The ever insightful Don Coxe of Coxe Advisors has released a transcript of his recent discussion on why the rally is fizzling. Aside from everything else, which as usual is spot on and must read, any paper that has the following statement: "In the New York Times today, Paul Krugman got into one of his splenetic rages but he is a terrific and articulate exemplar of the post-Keynesian (that claims to be Keynesian) school, which basically doesn&rsquo;t believe that government deficits are bad, (they are good) and paying for things in the next generation or the generations after it is okay where it to get us out of what we are in now, so as far as he&rsquo;s concerned, stimulus has to be done by increasing government deficits" is worth its weight on tungsten. Coxe also does the best summary of why the market has is barely changed both YTD and on a 1 Year basis: "<b>We have a buildup in cash (in print money that is) and we have a buildup in gold, and beyond that there&rsquo;s not much going on. </b>That&rsquo;s why the S&amp;P is up about 1% year over year and it&rsquo;s hardly of the kind of environment that&rsquo;s going to get those investors who left the stock market after the Flash Crash, saying &ldquo;We don&rsquo;t believe the market is any realistic place for ordinary individuals anymore&rdquo;&mdash; this is not going to get them running back in to buy stocks." But don't believe him- after all, there are thousands of paid for newsletters and momentum models, that promise they can time each and every up and downtick, and will certainly make you a trillionaire if not a billionaire (sic). <br />
<br />
For all those who would rather save their money, here are some always terrific insights from Don Coxe:<br />
<br />
  		 		 		 		 		 		 	<br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
h/t Chips4Pips<br />
<br />
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/PHg2hZ9aY3E" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~3/PHg2hZ9aY3E/coxe-advisors-discusses-fizzling-recovery-and-explains-why-market-same-level-now-over-year" target="_blank">More...</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/">Dagelijkse discussie</category>
			<dc:creator>ZeroHedge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.goud.com/dagelijkse-discussie/13713-coxe-advisors-discusses-fizzling-recovery-explains-why-market-essential.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
